Nagpur: With just a few hours left for voting, Nagpur has entered the quietest yet most tense phase of the Municipal Corporation elections. Campaigning has ended, flags have come down, and what remains is political suspense. Across the city, particularly in key wards, the battle is no longer about slogans-it is about credibility, ground networks, and voter memory.
This election is shaping up to be less about newcomers and more about reputations. Several heavyweight leaders are locked in direct contests, while internal rebellions and three-cornered fights have turned many wards into political hotspots.
The Hot Zones: Where Nagpur Is Watching Closely
Gold Rate
13 Jan 2026
Multiple wards have emerged as flashpoints where outcomes could signal the city’s broader political mood.
In Prabhag 28, the contest has drawn unusual attention due to an internal rift within the Shiv Sena (Thackeray faction). District chief Kishor Kumeriya is pitted against city chief Nitin Tiwari, turning the election into a symbolic clash of loyalty versus rebellion. In the same ward, BJP’s former city president Bunty Kukde faces Congress candidate Pravin Narad, making it one of the most crowded and unpredictable races.
In South Nagpur’s Reshimbagh (Prabhag 31), former Deputy Mayor Satish Hole is facing a strong challenge from Congress rebel Vijay Babhre. Party lines blur here, and individual influence matters more than symbols.
The Mahal area has become another pressure point. BJP’s former corporator Bandu Raut is being challenged by party rebel Dheeraj Chavan, believed to be close to a sitting MLA. This internal friction has weakened traditional vote consolidation and could lead to a surprise outcome.
In North Nagpur (Prabhag 2), well-known local face Manoj Sangole is facing a fresh Congress candidate, Manish Bansod. The contest reflects Congress’s strategy of introducing new faces against established local power centers.
Meanwhile, Prabhag 27 (Sakkardara) has turned into a three-way fight, with NCP (Ajit Pawar faction) state general secretary Tanaji Vanve competing against Congress’s Prashant Dhawad and BJP’s Pravin Gire making vote-splitting a decisive factor.
BJP vs Congress: Two Visions, Two Timelines
The manifestos released by BJP and Congress underline a sharp ideological contrast.
The BJP manifesto positions itself as future-oriented and infrastructure-driven. It avoids large-scale freebie commitments, instead focusing on long-term urban planning promising a “zero-carbon city” vision, metropolitan-style governance, expansion of transport systems, and international-standard civic infrastructure. Free bus travel has been limited to senior citizens above 70, signaling fiscal restraint and a development-first approach.
In contrast, the Congress manifesto leans heavily on immediate public relief. Promises include free water up to a fixed limit, free bus services, and direct civic subsidies aimed at easing daily urban stress. The pitch is clear: quick, tangible benefits over long-term structural reform.
Voters are effectively being asked to choose between short-term relief and long-term urban transformation a choice that has divided opinion across Nagpur’s neighborhoods.
Rebels, Reputation, and Reality
What stands out this election cycle is the scale of internal dissent. Rebels across parties-especially BJP and Congress- have turned several seats into prestige battles. In many wards, voters are less concerned about party ideology and more focused on accessibility, past performance, and local presence.
Political observers note that this is not a wave election. It is a seat-by-seat grind, where margins could be slim and surprises likely.
All Eyes on the EVMs
As Nagpur heads into voting day, the city is quieter-but far from calm. Every major party claims confidence, yet ground-level arithmetic tells a more complicated story. With reputations on the line, internal rivalries exposed, and contrasting development narratives at play, the Nagpur Municipal Corporation election is poised to deliver results that could reshape the city’s political balance.
For now, the arguments are over. The decision rests with the voter.
