Published On : Wed, Nov 16th, 2016

Sadhvi Pragya Bail Matter; High Court erked over delay in getting records

Sadhvi Pragya

Mumbai: Hearing the bail application of Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, arrested in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, the Bombay High Court today asked why the Record and papers of the case which were called by it’s earlier order was taking so long to be produced, when the special court seized with the Record is at stone’s throw distance from the High Court and when it pertains to a bail matter of the accused who is languishing in jail for 8 years.

Thakur moved the high court after the special court for Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act cases denied her bail on June 28.

The division bench of Justices Ranjit More and S. Joshi Phansalkar asked the NIA to submit a compilation of all the previous orders and judgements pertaining to the case.

Thakur was given a clean chit by the NIA earlier this year, but the trial court refused her bail.

Her petition in the high court said the lower court had failed to take into consideration the change in circumstances.

In November 2015, the special court denied her bail, holding that prima facie there was some evidence against her.

But in May, NIA filed a fresh charge sheet (after taking over the case from Maharashtra ATS), which gave a clean chit to Thakur.

Lawyers on behalf of Sadhvi Pragya contend that there was no material evidence against her. NIA’s counsel also told the high court that the agency had concluded that charges against her could not be substantiated, and the earlier charge sheet filed by ATS was erroneous.

Earlier the High Court had posed that “This is an odd case where the prosecution has no objections and yet the accused is denied bail and kept behind the bars,” the bench observed, seeking copies of both the charge sheets and the special court’s orders denying her bail.

Six persons died and 100 were injured in the bomb blast at Malegaon, a predominantly Muslim town in north Maharashtra, on September 29, 2008.

Noted Lawyer Senior Counsel Avinash Gupta assisted by Advocates Aakash Gupta and S Dewani appeared for the applicant.