Oops! It appears that you have disabled your Javascript. In order for you to see this page as it is meant to appear, we ask that you please re-enable your Javascript!
    | | Contact: 8407908145 |
    Published On : Tue, May 8th, 2018
    National News | By Nagpur Today Nagpur News

    Who set up bench to hear rejection of impeachment notice, Sibal wants to know

    Kapil Sibal

    New Delhi: Two Congress MPs today withdrew their plea in the Supreme Court challenging the rejection of the impeachment notice against Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra by Rajya Sabha Chairman M Venkaiah Naidu.

    After a 45-minute hearing, a five-judge bench headed by Justice A K Sikri declared the petition as dismissed as withdrawn.

    After senior advocate Kapil Sibal raised some objections on the setting up of the five-judge constitution bench to hear the matter, Attorney General K K Venugopal said only two MPs of Congress have approached the apex court. Venugopal submitted that six other parties, which had given a notice for impeachment, did not move the top court.

    The AG said “the presumption is that all others have not supported the stand taken by the Congress to challenge the rejection of impeachment notice by Naidu.”

    Earlier during the hearing, Sibal had raised questions on the setting up of the constitution bench, including who passed the order for setting up the five-judge bench to hear the matter. He further said the matter was listed before the five-judge bench through an administrative order and the CJI cannot pass such orders in this matter.

    Sibal had also sought a copy of the order on setting up of the bench, saying they intended to challenge it. However, the bench also comprising Justices S A Bobde, N V Ramana, Arun Mishra and A K Goel said it is a “piquant and unprecedented situation where the CJI is party and other four judges may also have some role”.

    Naidu had on April 23 rejected the impeachment notice against the CJI given by seven opposition parties led by the Congress on five grounds of “misbehaviour”. This was the first time that an impeachment notice was filed against a sitting CJI.

    Stay Updated : Download Our App
    Mo. 8407908145