Published On : Sat, Mar 21st, 2015

Gadkari appears in court in defamation case against Kejriwal

Advertisement
Union Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari comes out of Patiala House court in New Delhi on Saturday

Union Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari comes out of Patiala House court in New Delhi on Saturday

NewDelhi/Nagpur: Union Minister Nitin Gadkari on Saturday appeared before a Delhi court in connection with a criminal defamation complaint filed by him against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal.

Gadkari, Minister of Road Transport and Highways, was cross-examined for over two-and-a half hours by the counsel for Kejriwal, who has been permanently exempted from personal appearance before the court in the case.

During the cross-examination, he was asked about his alleged association with Nagpur-based Purti Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. He told the court that he was not a businessman and has been associated with co-operative initiatives and charitable trusts.

“It is incorrect to suggest that I am a businessman. In Maharashtra, lots of co-operative initiatives are there and I have been associated with co-operative institutions, charitable trusts and some of the public limited companies of the farmers and they are all social institutions,” Gadkari told Metropolitan Magistrate Gomati Manocha.

The proceedings witnessed heated exchange of words between the advocates appearing for Gadkari and Kejriwal.

While Gadkari’s counsel contended that defence lawyer was not asking relevant questions during cross-examination, the advocate representing Kejriwal said queries posed by him were relevant.

“He (Kejriwal’s counsel) can ask me any question. I am ready to give answers… these questions are not relevant to the case. He can ask any questions as per the charges and allegations levelled by him,” Gadkari told the magistrate.

The court was also irked with the heated exchange of words among the advocates. “If you (lawyers) want to fight then you can go outside,” the magistrate said.

Gadkari’s cross-examination remained inconclusive and it would continue on May 16.

Meanwhile, Kejriwal’s counsel moved an application seeking production of certain documents and the court asked Gadkari’s lawyer to respond to it on April 18.

Kejriwal had been summoned as an accused by the court in the defamation complaint in which Gadkari had alleged that he was defamed by the AAP leader who had included his name in the party’s list of “India’s most corrupt”.