Nagpur: The Bombay High Court’s Nagpur bench has come down heavily on the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) for its prolonged inaction against alleged illegal construction at Poonam Chambers, expressing strong displeasure over what it termed as “institutional silence” spanning nearly a decade.
Hearing a petition filed by former Corporator Vijay Babhre, a division bench comprising Justice Anil Pansare and Justice Nivedita Mehta pulled up the civic body for failing to act against the unauthorised structure despite clear legal findings. The court directed the NMC to submit a list of officials responsible for the inaction, warning that disciplinary action against erring officers could be recommended.
Court questions 10 years of inaction
Gold Rate
Feb 27th, 2026 - Time 11.45Hrs
The High Court sought a clear explanation as to why no action was taken between November 2015 and November 2024, even after the illegality of the building stood conclusively established. The bench noted that in 2015, the appeal filed by the respondent was withdrawn, making the illegal status of the construction final. Despite this, the NMC failed to carry out its statutory duty of demolition.
Terming the delay “unacceptable,” the court instructed the NMC’s counsel to place on record the names of all officials and municipal commissioners who were responsible for taking action since 2015. The bench indicated that accountability must be fixed for the sustained negligence.
Deadline advanced, no more delays
During the hearing, the NMC sought time until February 28, 2026, to take a decision. However, rejecting the request, the court ordered the civic body to take an appropriate and reasoned decision by January 21, 2026.
The judges made it clear that the action must strictly comply with the Supreme Court’s November 2024 directions, which mandate strict action, including demolition, against illegal constructions across the country.
Background of the case
The matter dates back to 2005, when Vijay Babhre approached the court alleging large-scale violations at Poonam Chambers. Records show that as early as 2004, the NMC had issued a notice declaring the seventh floor of the building completely illegal. The construction exceeded the sanctioned height by three metres, and shops were illegally built in the basement earmarked for parking.
Despite these violations being officially recorded, the structure continued to stand, prompting the court’s sharp observations on civic apathy.
The High Court’s order has now placed the spotlight firmly on the NMC’s functioning, with the possibility of action against responsible officials looming large if compliance is not ensured within the stipulated time.
